> When jobs get automated, almost always, people find other jobs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy

Yes yes I'm aware of the fallacy

It's obviously not the whole picture though. When Number of Jobs automated approaches 100% then what?

If the number of jobs automated approaches 100%, then either what small proportion that is left is still sufficient to pay people, whether because the number of jobs in absolute terms is still large, say by the creation of new types of work, or because of reduction in working hours, or mass unemployment eventually forces some form of redistribution.

Large scale automation is only a problem if society allows it to become a problem.

	▲	bluefirebrand an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> Large scale automation is only a problem if society allows it to become a problem. When I look around me I see a society that I think would happily have jackboots round up excess labor and execute us rather than redistribute money fairly So I wish I had your optimism

▲

jryle70 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> When Number of Jobs automated approaches 100% then what?

When was that? Or hypothetical? Why would that be and not that new jobs being created?