| ▲ | cowlevel 15 hours ago |
| Is this accounting for the fact that they kill people based on metadata? More technically complex and unreliable protocols such as SimpleX attempt to also protect the metadata. |
|
| ▲ | woodruffw 14 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Is what accounting for that? If you're worried about metadata leaks, you shouldn't be using email, full stop. |
| |
| ▲ | TFNA 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | By "metadata" GP is presumably talking, as I was, about Signal uploading most users' contact lists to the server with weak protection. | | |
| ▲ | akerl_ 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The point is that if the comparison point is PGP-encrypted email, which has no protection for any metadata and passes it on the wire in the clear, raising concerns about Signal’s metadata protections makes no sense. | | |
| ▲ | TFNA an hour ago | parent [-] | | In the context of this whole big thread, the point is that neither infamously leaky PGP nor Signal keep metadata secure from nation-level actors. |
|
|
|