> No text that is AI-generated may be published in our magazine.

What about other artifacts that you produce, such as images (that are not illustrations), videos, sound effects for your podcast, or the code that runs your website?

▲

piker 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Is your brain so fried you can't even read 3 consecutive sentences?

> am proud to say that as part of our new union contract, Current Affairs recently adopted one of the strictest anti-AI policies in the publishing industry. No text that is AI-generated may be published in our magazine. No AI-generated art may be used as a Current Affairs illustration.

▲

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

rescripting 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Its literally the next sentence.

> No AI-generated art may be used as a Current Affairs illustration

▲

sho_hn 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's literally the next sentence. Wow.

	▲	simoncion 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, I see this happen an awful lot here with entities that are expressing pro-LLM opinions. Maybe it's "engagement farming", old-fashioned low-effort trolling, antisocial attempts to make those expressing pro-LLM opinions look bad, or just crappy bots doing what crappy bots do. Whatever the reason for doing it, I wish the humans responsible for the behavior would fuckin quit it... it sucks.