Remix.run Logo
▲ overfeed 4 hours ago

> Granted, this has yet to be fully tested in court and going to court is expensive, so it's likely that your employer would prefer to err on the side of caution and respect such attempts at model licensing anyway, similar to how one might treat a ToS agreement.

You may be conflating 2 things - the Muse model weights themselves, and what the models output when run. The former is prima facie the product of human authorship and hence has full protection of copyright law, the latter fits your characterization of likely not having copyright coverage. Meta can use the copyright on the model weights to dictate licensing terms. IANAL too.

▲alsosprachben 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Model weights are facts. Facts are not copyrightable.

▲overfeed 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Model weights are facts.

Only in the way a math textbooks are facts. Model weights are bits on a medium,designed and derived from the combined efforts, judgement and expertise of many humans, before and after training.

Software bits have been copyrighted for so long, there are 5¼" floppies with "(c) 1977" printed on them.

▲kevincox 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The words in a novel and the order in which try appear are so facts. But somehow that is clearly copyrightable.

▲eli 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s really not that simple