| ▲ | georgemcbay 2 hours ago |
| Good. AI is great for some things. It is not currently great (or even remotely passable) at writing interesting magazine articles. |
|
| ▲ | ClikeX an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| If machines are writing articles, why am I reading all their prose. Might as well have my machine summarize them into something more digestible. |
| |
|
| ▲ | tcdent 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Nobody's saying it should take care of the entire process, but the idea of banning it from all parts of your process is an emotionally charged, short-sighted decision. |
| |
| ▲ | nozzlegear an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > but the idea of banning it from all parts of your process is an emotionally charged, short-sighted decision. Why? | |
| ▲ | vunderba an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Did you actually read the article? > Nothing in our rules prohibits writers from using a new tool to help them research something. | |
| ▲ | georgemcbay an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Nobody's saying it should take care of the entire process, but the idea of banning it from all parts of your process is an emotionally charged, short-sighted decision. Well they didn't do that, and in fact specifically mentioned how they are not doing that. So what are you even talking about? |
|
