Remix.run Logo
▲ Lombok Is Still Relevant in the Age of Java Records(swaranga.dev)
9 points by swaranga 3 days ago | 5 comments
▲rootsudo 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I’ve always been curious as to why Indonesia islands have been the naming convention for this sort of software for a long time.

It’s also funny because there is true irl “dark magic” for Java, Lombok and Bali.

Also surprised there isn’t much mention of Bali in general.

▲Randgalt 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Quality of life libraries like Lombok (or my library https://github.com/Randgalt/record-builder) are now anachronisms. Agents don’t need libraries to avoid writing getters, setters, etc. Lombok et al are for humans and the days of human coding are ending, sadly.

▲cidd an hour ago | parent | next [-]

With that logic every library ever created is now anachronism. Agent can just always code using standard library of the programming language.

▲swaranga 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Lots to agree; I am certainly feeling it these days. I used to be excited for new language features (records, pattern matching) but I was looking at the recently posted Devoxx conference talks on Youtube and for every one of these, I was thinking "what's the point? The code will be written by an agent anyway".

▲jen20 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

This article does less to convince me that Lombok is worthwhile and more that Java (the language, not the JVM) is not.