So I’m supposed to maintain a native app for each platform and try to be sure they’re aligned in every way except visuals? Sounds like a recipe for bad UX if anybody uses more than one of them.

▲

Kuyawa 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not you, your coding agent, for three platforms and at least ten languages

If you go Rust all the way all you need is the installer for each platform

	▲	rafaelmn an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Agents are pretty shit at making UX decisions unless you're heavily in the training distribution

▲

bigstrat2003 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

On the contrary: using a web view is the worst possible UX for your users. It's slow, uses a ton of memory, and doesn't integrate well with the desktop. The only reason people ever did it was laziness, not because it produced a better product.

▲

Rohansi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I'd argue that being slow and using a ton of memory has more to do with (very) poorly optimized websites rather than blaming browsers as a whole. Sure, they'll never be as efficient as native, but people put a lot of work into optimizing browsers and most websites are never optimized.

Memory use alone is an interesting case for comparison because websites tend to have a lot more images/videos loaded than other applications. All of those PNGs and JPEGs need to be decompressed before you can paint them to the screen which makes them much larger.

▲

skydhash 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> I'd argue that being slow and using a ton of memory has more to do with (very) poorly optimized websites rather than blaming browsers as a whole.

A web browser is a huge platform. Audio, 2D and 3D graphics, file handling, network requests,... A lot of code while your application needs are tiny. That is wasteful and a security risk.

	▲	Rohansi 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's really only argument against shipping a browser with your application. For ordinary websites (or WebViews) that's not really a concern because it is shared and automatically updated.