The beginning of this article is decent, the end sounds like a tobacco lobbyist touting the health benefits of nicotine.

> If intelligence becomes less uniquely human, we may come to value more highly what remains uniquely human: our capacity to relate and to care for one another.

Lol. How does the author think relations between people work? (At least those outside the family). Relationships require something that fills them with meaning - a reason why you would want to have that relationship in the first place. Without meaning, no relationship.

I recommended reading this other post that was on HN earlier today: https://thetheorygirlie.substack.com/p/ai-was-great-until-it...

It describes in pretty grim words what happens to collaboration once you have nothing anymore to collaborate on.

> Mathematicians may still teach proofs, argue over what they mean, translate alien logic into human insight, and pass that understanding to students.

This would people to have time to understand and dissect those proofs - it doesn't work if there is a new breakthrough proof every week.