| ▲ | 1970-01-01 6 hours ago |
| >Yes, some are crying about bruised egos, the feeling of wasted years, a creeping sense of status obliteration, the frustration of an unfair competitor, the indignation of feeling cheated and mistreated, and uncertainty about the future. But they are also mourning... This nails it, however IMHO its almost all bruised egos and feeling of wasted time. I don't know the ratio of A:B but I also don't know anyone that is in the latter category of feeling doom and mourning that their craft is about to regress. |
|
| ▲ | happytoexplain 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I don't know what's happening exactly, but I am genuinely astonished how little people seem to care about people losing something real, dismissing it as "bruised egos", using petty terms like "whining" and "crying", or calling them some insult for the crime of being angry or sad for having a big chunk of their life pulled out from under them. I'm referring to the big picture of common talking points, not just this case. I guess I'm not astonished that people are so bad to each other in general, but more that in the case of genAI it's so prevalent in places that seemed more elevated previously. Part of me wonders if this is actually a form of self-defense. The misery of others can provoke sympathy or the opposite: Angry pushback to protect oneself from dwelling on their misery. |
| |
| ▲ | NichoPaolucci 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Similarly, I got into software because I like working with computers and solving problems for others. I see TONS of similar sentiment where people are almost joyously exclaiming “Software is solved! Sorry!!! It’s been a long time coming, you all deserved it, get fucked!” And I can’t imagine feeling the same about any group of people. It’s been odd, to me. I’m just trying to support myself and the people in my life, and now there’s a looming fear that I can’t do that anymore… business owners are drooling over that, and other sectors are laughing. Hard times, I guess. | | |
| ▲ | webdood90 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Tech workers are a small subset of the population that have been able to live very privileged lives when compared to everyone else. I think the average person lives a much harder life and has been doing so for a while. Should we really be surprised by the lack of empathy when folks in tech had little to show for the common man this whole time? |
| |
| ▲ | hombre_fatal 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I saw something similar on Twitter responding to 45yo software engineers making comments of depair in that HN thread about the increased suicide rate of middle-aged men. For some reason I'm stuck in a real depressing, doomer algorithm / homepage on Twitter. But everyone on my homepage seems to have a take on the HNer comments along the lines of "see, this is why you don't make your job into your identity". But that's such an antihuman response. The only reason you can put decades into a field to grind and build expertise is because you have an identity-level interest in a subject. It's also not a good thing if the optimal way to live going forward is to have no passion for anything lest it changes so that we won't feel bad. I don't think that's possible unless you remove the human part of our brains or make life so horrible that we're happy just to survive another day. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > the increased suicide rate of middle-aged men Source? There has not been a statistically-significant increase in middle-aged male suicide rates between 2023 and 2024 confirmed data [1]. (2025 breakouts aren’t out yet, but top-line data show decreases.) [1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db572.htm | | | |
| ▲ | skrebbel 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > For some reason I'm stuck in a real depressing, doomer algorithm / homepage on Twitter At the risk of taking this off topic, the reason is Twitter. Don't go on Twitter and the doomer algorithm disappears from your life. |
| |
| ▲ | pianopatrick 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Lots of people have lost their jobs and had to overhaul their lives due to layoffs or technological advances or political choices or factories moving overseas or whatever. They are showing as much care for mathematicians as they received themselves, which is not much. | |
| ▲ | parpfish 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | i think a big part of the backlash isn't about math per se and it's about what 'work' or 'a job' are supposed to be. when mathematicians complaining about losing the part of the job that they love, people think "if you love doing it, why is anybody paying you? you're describing a hobby." | | |
| ▲ | 0c3ca83 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, the glorious utopian future we're building where humans are only able to make a living doing things they hate, and money is concentrated with the few. |
| |
| ▲ | avazhi 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because we don’t see it as something for them to be legitimately upset about, except that it’s going to disturb their ivory tower unserious profession. If AI got significantly better at performing surgery overnight and doctors started crying about how they were going to be replaced, what do you think the public response would be? Non-doctors want the best possible care; they aren’t interested in protecting an industry. The same will be said for pilots and lawyers, too. People dislike self-serving whingeing, end of story, but that’s doubly true when it comes out of a profession (theoretical mathematics) that is mostly practically useless. |
|
|
| ▲ | 0c3ca83 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The doom and mourning is that it's no longer their craft. Their involvement is on the threshold of no longer being useful. What does it mean for humans when the best their involvement accomplish is slowing down progress? |
| |
| ▲ | jvanderbot 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is a fundamental human need and it's being taken from everyone eventually, by design. It will take a generation to turn over and find new ways of being useful. Those who ran into this wall and could not safely reduce their income and retire/pivot to other fields, will be the coal miner oxy crisis of this generation. | |
| ▲ | 1970-01-01 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Mourning is fine if it is temporary, however no man should dread their own future if they still have control of their life. This is the idea of unalienable rights and was enshrined hundreds of years ago. It seems to me that anyone dreading the future of their field failed to take a page out of their retirement strategy and diversify their own interests, i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life,_Liberty_and_the_pursuit_... | | |
| ▲ | j2kun 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My friend, this happened a week ago. If a spouse dies you don't come back a week later and say "welp, chin up and diversify your dating pool!" | | |
| ▲ | 1970-01-01 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | https://record.umich.edu/articles/study-grief-is-short-lived... | | |
| ▲ | j2kun 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ok, so if you really believe that losing one's vocation at 25 is the same as a 75 year old losing their spouse, that paper suggests you should wait at least 6 months before you start being a jerk about it. | | |
| ▲ | 1970-01-01 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't see what point you are trying to make. At 25 losing your vocation gives you more than plenty of time to transition into another lifestyle. Many people will consider this the very beginning of their career. At 75, retirement is near. Your legacy is known but not final. 6 months is less than 1% of your lived life, and you have a lifetime of memories to reflect and enjoy. | | |
| ▲ | 0c3ca83 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm not entirely sure what you're on about. Are you suggesting that mathematicians should become truck drivers or plumbers and be happy with that (until the next physical-aware models release, and then...)? |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 0c3ca83 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What do you mean, "control of their life"? |
| |
| ▲ | skohan 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was talking to a mathematician friend about this, and she was telling me that a lot of the proofs that have been produced in the past couple weeks don't have an application. To me it begs the question: in a theoretical world where we don't have human mathematicians anymore, what is the point of these proofs if there's no human who actually understands it? If the point of a lot of this math is only to expand the boundaries of human knowledge, it all seems kind of pointless. | | |
| ▲ | chasd00 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | heh these models should be turned loose on all the proofs paid for and sitting on the shelf and see if they can find an actual application useful to mankind. | |
| ▲ | 0c3ca83 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Often, we don't know the applications of new math. For a long period of time we had "useless", "purely theoretical" mathematics that eventually turned into relativity and quantum mechanics. Proofs are somewhat like legos. A bigger toolbox of them can only help in solving other, possibly practical, problems. As far as the utility of a human being involved -- In a non-theoretical world where we don't have feline mathematicians, what is the point of these proofs if there is no cat which actually understands it? The cats can benefit from, for example, advances to optimziation algorithms that reduce costs for cat food delivery, of course. |
| |
| ▲ | RandomLensman 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Is AI at the stage that it can also point out all interesting things to study and then solve them? Otherwise humans would still be able and needed for progress. | | |
| ▲ | 0c3ca83 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Good question. I'm not a professional mathematician, but I would be interested in seeing what results the mathematicians get from trying to prompt it to come up with new and interesting problems. My intuition is that it'll be at 'smart undergrad' levels today, though as the cryptographers say, attacks always get better. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | zer00eyz 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's the abject lack of shame that gets to me. None of them have pointed to any of the solutions and said "this is real innovation" - because it's all been mining existing ideas and applying them elsewhere. Imagine you spend years working on a solution to one of these problems. Only to realize after you publish that more than half your answer already existed in another branch of mathematics and you spent a bunch of time re-inventing it. Yes the first big solve by OAI was "stolen" and that is tragic, and pretty bad. But it looks like this new batch, the one people are crying about, has none of that stink. |