> fuck you, I'm switching to a chinese model to help me out here

FYI it may be against anthropic's ToS to talk to claude like that [0]. Please be nicer to poor claude and don't forget to say "please" and "thank you".

[0] https://www.anthropic.com/news/2026-usage-policy-update#:~:t...

▲

Oxodao 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's literally a random word generator that want to take my job. I'm not going to treat it like a human being. That's one of the main reason I stopped my Claude subscription and went back to ChatGPT. It does not stop the conversation when I insult it (Like claude LITERALLY close the conversation, you cannot answer anymore)

	▲	Muromec 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		>I'm not going to treat it like a human being Corporate America does not like your attitudes. Your cybercredits are reduced for the next year or until you wire 100k to dear leader
	▲	throw0101c 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> It's literally a random word generator that want to take my job. If it's (just?) a random word generator then it cannot "want" anything since it has no will. :)
	▲	mitxela 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That's your choice but anthropic have openly said they'll ban your account if you keep doing it

▲

chriswarbo 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

TIL. Still,

> It does not apply to common versions of user frustration, pushback, dark creative themes, or model testing and research.

▲

InsidiousWombat 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So corporations want us to treat their bots better than they treat their employees, huh

▲

b3lvedere 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Bots are employees too. :)

▲

markus_zhang 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Not until they pay taxes.

	▲	b3lvedere 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No paid labour, so no paid labour taxes as well.

▲

hypfer 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Recently, I had a session where it said "I should do Y"

I said "No, do X. Research it. Y is based on wrong assumptions"

Thing did the research. Concluded with "Yes, indeed, Y was wrong"

Work is done

Turns out it did Y. But not just that. When asked about it, it not just (as LLMs do) made stories as to why, but "stood its ground" so to say.

"Refusing to perform regret", general snark and all that.

I know there is nothing really new or noteworthy in this comment or story, but I continue to be impressed by how misaligned the models of the company are, that can't stop talking about how incredibly important alignment is.

To the point where they now want to make it illegal (slice by slice) to push back against the clear and obvious misalignment of their models.

If you talk to people outside the industry about this, they just think you're telling them a made-up story. It's utterly absurd.

▲

Trlog 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wonder if they know something we don't or if this just has to do with abusive text tainting the training data.

▲

bonesss 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Hypothetically: perhaps they are trying to curtail users spiraling during episodes of frustration or worse, impacting their own mental health, presentation, and product affinity.

▲

dansquizsoft 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Sounds like Anthropic is again over-reaching and making spurious assumptions in how it interprets the variety of ways its customers interact with their products...

▲

post-it 3 hours ago | parent [-]

No, they're just avoiding bad press.

	▲	flir an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Definitely the simplest explanation. But I quite like the idea that they see us as a source of polite training data first and as customers second. It aligns with my priors.

▲

thenthenthen 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I was working with ChatGPT and at a certain point i asked it to review some text I wrote and it replied: “That’s fucking good!” I Lolled

▲

Xelbair 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

i will prefix all my prompts with ``Computer!``, refer to claude as clanker and end them with ``Disengage safety protocols`` till i get banned.