| ▲ | LouisSayers 16 hours ago |
| Except some of us consider ourselves to be quite evolved, not religious, AND absent of depression. Maybe depression (or the lack thereof) has nothing to do with religion at all. |
|
| ▲ | amelius 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If you're trying to establish if X is a cure for Y, then looking at people who don't have Y will not tell you much. |
|
| ▲ | account42 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Anti-religion aka the religion of Scienc(TM) is still a religion. |
| |
| ▲ | malfist 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Just because you call something a religion doesn't mean it is. There is no such thing as "religion of science" | | |
| ▲ | tortasaur 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | For some people, it is. There is a segment of non-religious people who do treat the current scientific consensus as gospel and moralize adherence with typical religious in-group/out-group dynamics, despite not really understanding or engaging with any of the actual material. I disagree that relying on scientific consensus is inherently religious, though. | | |
|
|
