Remix.run Logo
▲ dnautics 6 hours ago

in principle you should be able to reject the mortgage sale, too. purely hypothetical but: suppose some bank was responsible for killing a family member, you shouldn't be forced to owe that bank money.

This means that any mortgage transfer would come with a 'sweetener deal'. If you don't object to the transfer you get a small reduction in your monthlies, e.g.

▲jongjong 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I assume the right to sell the mortgage to anyone they want is part of the original mortgage contract.

▲dnautics 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah I don't know why I wrote "in principle". I meant "ideally"

▲jongjong 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Understood, but they've got all the leverage, unfortunately. In countries like Australia, it's essentially impossible to get a fixed rate mortgage (for the life of the mortgage), when it would probably has been a great deal a few years ago; banks have all the leverage to dictate the terms.

With variable-rate mortgages, banks can insulate themselves from inflation risks, which they themselves create.

▲dnautics 43 minutes ago | parent [-]

Popular discontent and laws really would be the only way