So they held back a bunch of features because they knew they had basically no moat, and now they're trickling out a bit more functionality to try to convince people they are better than others and move fast? And using Apple advert slogans to show how cool they are?

▲

aryabakh 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

With the speed they're adding features shows you're correct.

▲

ranger_danger 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Which others?

▲

benaduggan 2 hours ago | parent [-]

There are several public benchmarks for decision models where they don't top every single one. https://benchmarkheaven.com/jev-models/all

I guess their cheeky "Warning: AI Benchmarks, don't trust them" is their way out of that one.

	▲	woadwarrior01 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The way that site charges a fee[1] for benchmarking models, makes any benchmarks on it very sus, IMO. TBF, the benchmarking site is probably more profitable than TypeSafe, just like the joke about how WinRAR is more profitable than OpenAI[2]. :) [1]: https://benchmarkheaven.com/submit [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49797811