| ▲ | fcarraldo 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
A lot of people are already responding either "Yes" or "No", but I have a slightly different take. The guy is liable for damages. If no damages were caused, there's no lawsuit. The government doesn't put people on trial for unauthorized access (unlike, say, murder). Someone needs to file charges. However, if the guy _were_ sued by his gym for damages, it should be his perogative to ultimately sue Anthropic to cover the damages and the legal fees. The system is set up this way on purpose. You can't sue another party on someone else's behalf. The gym can't even prove that Claude did it - the guy might be full of shit. They sue the accountable party (the person who accessed the site without authorization) and then the accountable party is free to sue the tool maker for selling a dangerous tool negligently. edit: damn actually tecoholic said this too and i missed it. well, anyway i agree with that guy. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rcxdude 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
With a civil suit you can sue multiple parties. It wouldn't be unusual, if the gym decided to sue, for them to sue the guy and anthropic in the same lawsuit. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||