| ▲ | motionlessveloc 8 hours ago |
| Last I checked, actual evidence that flossing is helpful seems pretty limited. " In light of the results of this comprehensive literature search and critical analysis, it is concluded that a routine instruction to use floss is not supported by scientific evidence." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19138178/ |
|
| ▲ | ikrenji 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35451656/ Conclusions: Interproximal gingival inflammation may be significantly reduced by toothbrushing alone, the effect being significantly enhanced when toothbrushing is combined with dental floss. |
|
| ▲ | nidnogg 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have always been an infrequent flosser, but deep down I've hoped for something like this to reach mainstream scientific consensus for a while so I no longer beat myself over it. Fingers crossed this is not a skewed study |
| |
| ▲ | throwaway2037 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There are two tricks to mostly avoid flossing. Before you brush your teeth, use a interdental brush in the gaps between your teeth. Depending upon the shape of your mouth and tooth placement, there might be one or two gaps that you cannot reach. Next, brush your teeth. Finally, one or twice a week, after you brush your teeth, floss the gaps that your interdental brush cannot reach. Why after brushing? So your flossing won't smell bad. That is one of the biggest complaints about flossing when people are surveyed. | |
| ▲ | NetMageSCW 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | At my dentist’s recommendation I’ve been using Proxabrush every day. It is very important not to force it, and my teeth are very tight so I had to get the smaller ones (I even have trouble flossing between some) but I had some early decay between some teeth and these seem really good with trapped material before regular electric brushing. | |
| ▲ | drowntoge 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Water flosser. | | |
| ▲ | skirmish 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I told my dentist how much I liked my water flosser, and he immediately said "that's fine but it's not very effective, you still need to use regular floss too". | | |
| ▲ | Daneel_ an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I use both, and I can say that I definitely get more out from between my teeth with the water flosser. These days string floss is just for when I have something big stuck tightly that I know the water flosser won't be able to shift. | |
| ▲ | panopticon 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Meanwhile my dentist said I should be using a water flosser instead of regular flossing. |
| |
| ▲ | contingencies 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Came to post this. These things are frigging amazing and like $20. Absolutely everyone should have one. Really you can floss and brush and it still gets stuff. I wish they existed when I was younger! Buy one! Thank me later! On the 'dentists don't really know what they're doing' front, my kid's orthodontist ($$$$) describes himself as a "fencing contractor". Conversely, I got the water flosser tip from an Indonesian dentist who I hired opportunistically on holiday for a clean; he turned up in flip-flops but decanted to bare feet during operating and gave the most sage advice I've ever had in 40+ years of dentists: BUY A WATER FLOSSER. Terimakasih, Doktor! | |
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | luipugs 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I regularly get food particles out of my molars using floss that brushing wouldn't have been able to, so for me it works. |
|
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | vmg12 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > actual evidence that flossing is helpful seems pretty limited If I don't floss my breath smells terrible because of bacteria and bacteria causes tooth decay. I'm pretty certain I'm not special. |
| |
| ▲ | aeonik 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | It depends on the bacteria living in your mouth. Some people get lucky, and even with low brushing, won't get cavities. | | |
| ▲ | naishoya 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | 50+, terrible at brushing and oral hygene in general. Actually lived in the jungle for years, almost like a caveman. 25+ years without a single dentist visit. Was in Thailand last spring, went to a dentistry shop in the mall as a walk-in, paid about 45 dollars for a deep cleaning and panoramic x-ray. Other than some startlingly crunky plaque in the rinse and spit cycles, zero cavities, zero need for intervention. It all comes down to the microbiome. I blame the complete lack of 'antiseptic' mouthwash and other interventions that skew the microbial populations, combined with just plain good luck. I refuse to use antibiotic soaps either. I reserve the tools of sterility for the space in front of my laminar flow hood and the like when preparing live cultures for cheeses and brews. I lived where fluoridated water was a practice during my early years when my teeth had formed - as that's actually when the flouride has the most impact...once the teeth are built, there's little effect from consuming flouride on the enamel. Later in late grade-school I lived in a place where fluoridated water had not happened, and so the school was doing a routine annual flouride mouth rinse-and-spit routine in the class. Was a 'conscientious objector' causing some chagrin for the teachers, they would pass out the little cup of chemical brew and start the timer, while i just stared at the paper cup and got threatened with having to write "I will ...." sentences as punishment. Even that didn't really have any impact on my actions. Adding another hashmark by my name on the blackboard as a tally of pages of meaningless repetitive sentences which I would never actually do or turn in. That had zero leverage against my test scores or passing any subject. So what if I couldn't go out to recess to sweat on a bare dirt playground with zero swings or other appeal. Fine by me. But, by 3rd grade I already had my own two-stage steromicroscope and was acutely aware of the need for balanced microbiomes in all of life, learning about soil and aquatic microbiomes from my grandfather. So, very much not the normal kid. All that aside, my gums could use more care, so I'm trying to be more diligent and brush daily with salt, baking soda and the tiniest bit of fennel and mint oil. Its showing some improvement. | | |
| ▲ | fn-mote 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I love this story, but science was invented so we didn’t have to stick to anecdotes. For myself, I’ll take my chances with the “recommended treatment”. | |
| ▲ | throwaway2037 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What is "deep cleaning" compared to regular, twice a year dental cleaning? |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | what 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is this because people don’t floss properly? Or is it a study of people who floss properly? |
|
| ▲ | ButlerianJihad 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Flossing is not merely essential to dislodging recalcitrant food particles, but also gives great stimulation to the gums themselves, and none of that effort is a waste, IMHO. It is not sugar that causes dental caries, but bacteria. Flossing that old food out from between teeth is guaranteed to cut down bacteria growth! Furthermore, my new and wonderful dentist and his hygienists wholeheartedly recommend and encourage the practice. So perhaps you can excuse me for ignoring a singular “research study”. |
| |
| ▲ | csnover 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | It was a systematic review, not a “singular ‘research study’”. A newer 2019 Cochrane review[0] found about the same: > The evidence was limited in applicability and was incomplete. The included studies only presented data on gingivitis, plaque, and adverse events; most did not measure or report other important outcomes such as periodontitis or interproximal caries. … Additional use of floss or interdental brushes compared to toothbrushing alone may reduce gingivitis or plaque, or both, and interdental brushes may be more effective than floss. The evidence is low to very low‐certainty, and the effect sizes observed may not be clinically important. [0] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6953268/ | | |
| ▲ | raddan 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I am highly skeptical. In my younger years, I brushed regularly but did not floss at all. After dealing with a surprising number of cavities over a short period of time, I decided to just start flossing, morning and night. Not only does flossing remove quite a bit of, er... stuff... that toothbrushing does not seem to get, I have not had a single new cavity in 25 years. The only issues I've had were old fillings falling out, including one that cracked my tooth which required a crown. Not a lot of work considering the time span. Obviously one person is not "data" but seeing as I am that one person, I'm going to keep flossing. |
|
|