[flagged]

scottyah 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Can we narrow down asking for a link to be some sort of legitimate news? These are links to forum posts linking to bluesky posts of "political commentators" that are factually incorrect.

Starlink != Starshield. Musk does not own Starshield. SpaceX does not own it. It's like blaming a flight route cancellation on Boeing.

▲

toomuchtodo 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Poland Grills Musk About New Starlink Restrictions in Ukraine - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-10-14/poland-gr... - October 14, 2026

Gift link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-10-14/poland-gr...

Paywall Bypass: https://archive.today/NSzQK

https://x.com/sikorskiradek/status/2110273651023151330 | https://archive.today/QMMFU

> Hey, @elonmusk, big man, are you playing politics with your products again? As your European customers, we are watching you. -- Radosław Sikorski, Wicepremier, Minister Spraw Zagranicznych (2:37 AM · Oct 14, 2026, 1.8M Views)

(Radosław Tomasz "Radek" Sikorski is a Polish politician, journalist and statesman who is the longest-serving Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs since 2023, previously holding the office between 2007 and 2014, since 2025 also serving as Deputy Prime Minister)

Ukraine's Starlink restrictions raise suspicions of Musk, Trump retaliation - https://www.axios.com/2026/10/14/ukraine-starlink-zelensky-s... - October 14th, 2026

▲

scottyah 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I appreciate the response, but quotes of people spreading known misinformation is not addressing the main concern. These are still just opinions.

	▲	toomuchtodo 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Goal posts moving at the speed of light. Axios and Bloomberg are only not legitimate when you’ve already made up your mind. As your comment said: > Can we narrow down asking for a link to be some sort of legitimate news? These are links to forum posts linking to bluesky posts of "political commentators" that are factually incorrect. Please prove this is “known misinformation” with citations. If you cannot, simply say you cannot.

▲

PorciiVorbesc 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Out of curiosity, how do you get all these many sources? Did you use a bot, or do you have much free time on your hands and a lot of emotional investment in the argument ?

▲

jacquesm 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Some people have a conscience.

▲

toomuchtodo 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If It's Worth Your Time To Lie, It's Worth My Time To Correct It - https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/if-its-worth-your-time-to-l... - June 11th, 2025

Indeed, lots of free time because I've done well. Condolences to those who haven't yet. When all you've got is time, to be a scholar is divine (imho) if you have the means. Good luck to those who continue to grind for frivolous causes.

https://giphy.com/gifs/crazy-johnny-depp-jack-Efi4MpChuhHtm

Edit: @jacquesm highest praise, many thanks.

▲

PorciiVorbesc 4 hours ago | parent [-]

>If It's Worth Your Time To Lie, It's Worth My Time To Correct It

Where did I lie?

>to be a scholar is divine (imho)

Being an internet armchair warrior isn't really being a scholar though. Reddit is full of these too.

>because I've done well. Condolences to those who haven't yet. Good luck to those who continue to grind for frivolous causes.

Wow, how modest and humble too.

	▲	toomuchtodo 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I should’ve been more specific with regards to my citation. You asked for evidence, I provided links as requested. Is it worth my time to? Sure, it takes but a moment. We discuss on a foundation of facts and evidence. Is my time spent doing other activities instead of discussing current events? It’s irrelevant, it’s how I choose to spend my time. I share, I learn, I know. I don’t have strong feelings on the topic, and how others think of me is not important to me (with regards to your comments about how I spend my time). Facts are facts. I hope this context answers your questions.