Remix.run Logo
▲ onlyrealcuzzo 10 hours ago

Never had a cavity in my life.

The dentist office I went to switched my dentist, and suddenly, I had a cavity in almost every tooth, and he recommended drilling on the spot.

Went to a different dentist. As expected they said I do not have any cavities.

It's kind of interesting that nothing will happen as a result of that.

▲cameldrv 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I had a similar experience. They'll show you the x-rays, but honestly I can't see anything. Having moved around a bit and had a few dentists, I've noticed a distinct pattern where the ones that have the nicest looking offices with the highest tech equipment will recommend the most aggressive things. Look for an office that's functional but slightly shabby.

▲fourside 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It's kind of interesting that nothing will happen as a result of that.

If you live in the US you can report them to your state’s board of dentistry. Not sure how responsive they are in your particular state but in mine they take that stuff seriously.

▲kube-system 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is unfortunately very common. I don’t think it is always necessarily malpractice but a difference in opinion and judgement on when to intervene. And of course, there is a financial incentive to shift that judgement to an earlier timeline.

IMO this is a good litmus test for choosing a dentist.

A dentist with nuanced and honest judgment will identify questionable spots, probe them, ask you about your experience (“does it hurt”), and explain the difference between something to watch and when it is actually problematic.

A lazy dentist trying to make a buck will take a quick look and tell you that you have a bunch of cavities that need to be addressed now.

Just like software engineering, there’s always the guy who will recommend kubernetes for every problem, and then there’s the guy who says “ah yeah, you can just do this with a shell script until you need more”

▲fn-mote 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> don’t think it is always necessarily malpractice

The fact that there isn’t a clear standard of care is part of the problem here.

With a scientific you could say it was or was not malpractice. I never expect to see an approach like that succeed, for much the same reason that it is hard to get useful stats on doctors (or teachers!).

▲jayknight 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Who would you sue? The one that missed all of your serious cavities or the one who is exaggerating the tiny ones to make a buck?

▲gfody 10 hours ago | parent [-]

the one who lied about there being cavities in the first place

▲programmertote 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Oh man, that is so true! I just left a comment about that. :D

▲tkdb 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is horrifying.