Deletions happen, but that is what you have backups for. I do not understand how you can have hundreds of days of work and never test if your backups work.

▲

marginalia_nu 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Worth noting that TV4 has been in a vicious circle of cutbacks and savings for quite a few years now. Back when they were still on air it felt like there were more ad slots than broadcast content, pushing away ever more of what little viewership they still retained, they've been constantly cancelling popular shows in favor of cheaper ones. Though like I alluded to earlier, they aren't as far as I know even broadcast on air anymore.

I very much get the sense they're dismantling the furniture and using it as firewood. It feels like the sort of place that very well could fire the entire IT staff and give that responsibility to the CEO's nephew and claude code instead. Not saying that is what transpired, but I wouldn't be surprised if it did.

	▲	robin_reala 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They stopped in January: https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/eM3mQa/tv4-slutar-sanda...
	▲	Lagoon3384_SWE 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]

▲

matthewfcarlson 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wonder if their editing nas died and fried everything on it. If you only backup your backup every couple of months I can see it.

▲

hobo123 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At least now they tested the backup/restore and now know it didn't work.

A backup shouldn't be considered working until a restore (plus checksum of the complete file tree) has been successfully tested.

▲

shiandow 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Wouldn't surprise me if the editing process involves a lot of files on cheap storage with little to no backup.

▲

overcast 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There is A LOT of garbage IT staff out there. A lot. Especially when it's outsourced MSP. I've walked into environments, where the backup software just repeatedly show failed jobs for MONTHS. No one checking on anything, email alerts if they are even configured, dumping into a mailbox no one checks. It's pathetic.

	▲	tecleandor 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		In a previous employer, the outsourced ERP (Navision) administrator, after finding the MS SQL Integrity Checks of the database were failing in the periodical maintenance tasks, he just disabled the integrity checks. Magic! Errors fixed!
	▲	cube00 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As a new starter to the team I was flooded with alert emails every few minutes. When I asked what the deal was, was promptly given a bunch of mail rules every other team member used to dump them all into another folder they never looked at.

▲

segmondy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

what do you need backup for, when you regen everything in 5 seconds with AI. perhaps they replaced backup with AI too.

▲

thewhitetulip 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, if you have followed the latest trends, all established practices hage gone out the window to be replaced with "an agent with a prompt and a prayer"

▲

embedding-shape 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> I do not understand how you can have hundreds of days of work and never test if your backups work

You outsource it, then you file a P4 ticket to test those "just in case" that will be done in a future sprint (never), but all of you more or less trust the outsourcing partner actually has their shit together.

Personally I wouldn't trust any backup system without also testing and verifying the restore, but I've worked in plenty of places where their main database is automatically backed up by AWS or whatever, and no one cares to test the restore because "Why would it be broken if it's provided by AWS?!" and similar opinions drown out the more careful ones.