I don't understand how it's "too far" in any way, provided that Russia has since the start of the war struck against Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, including datacenters. The only way I can read this is as an example of heavily pro-Russian bias.

▲

jacquesm an hour ago | parent [-]

"heavily pro-Russian bias"

That's a very friendly term. I would use aiding and abetting a common enemy instead. And make no mistake: russia never stopped being an enemy of the USA, they just switched their tactics. Trump is probably the best ROI of any investment ever.

▲

lostmsu 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Right, because Starlink is provided to Russia and denied to Ukraine.

▲

Maakuth an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Calling things as they are earns heavy downvotes here. It does make me think not all of the bots were in those Yandex DCs.

▲

jacquesm an hour ago | parent [-]

IDGAF. Things are what they are. The current US president might as well be a russian asset if he isn't in actual fact and his from-the-heart-saluting side-kick is spending his money all over the world to help get more fascists elected. It's pretty clear.

	▲	lostmsu a minute ago \| parent [-]
		[delayed]