Could you elaborate on some of these "bad things"?

Many DEI programs were highly discriminatory if not outright racist towards certain minorities that were seen as less worthy. Asians and Jewish individuals were often heavily discriminated against via DEI initiatives. The list goes on.

These programs were, in theory, well intentioned but to suggest they did nothing wrong is simply factually incorrect.

▲

krapp an hour ago | parent [-]

The true motivations of the anti-DEI movement were obvious when they attacked DEI as a concept rather than just the corruption they claimed existed within the system, and proceeded to do things like blame plane crashes on the hiring of black pilots. There were already laws on the books against hiring discrimination.

Maybe a few naive people in the movement had good intentions but they were clearly dupes for what was at its core a right-wing white supremacist and incel ideology.

And the proof is in the pudding. Has the anti-DEI movment (and current administration) created a truly fair and equitable society that focuses on merit in the absence of gender and race? No. It has created a society in which the contributions of anyone other than white men are systemically attacked, torn down and even erased from the public record.

	▲	randallsquared 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> they attacked DEI as a concept rather than just the corruption they claimed existed People who crusade against DEI generally think that the concept is corruption, rather than being an unrelated side matter. > There were already laws on the books against hiring discrimination. Those are exactly the laws being used to attack DEI practices, though they were by consensus not previously wielded against clear violations that were intended virtuously.

▲

samlinnfer 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Racism