Reducing funding for something sometimes harmful, which then correspondingly means the funding is not passed on to others, is not the Holocaust.

The utter degrading of the meanings of powerful words might get us there, though.

> Reducing funding for something sometimes harmful, which then correspondingly means the funding is not passed on to others, is not the Holocaust.

This is a rather boring straw man characterisation of the claim you are replying to. Don’t do this.