You could also say that DEI is easier to defend when human work was more valuable and capital was cheaper.

You could say that it was easier to practice before the executive (that routinely hires the dumbest troglodytes - whose only qualification is loyalty to the fuhrer - into positions of power) started a witchhunt against anyone practicing it.

Since the only god our corporatations worship goes by power and money, they all started tripping over themselves to kiss the ring.

	▲	tossandthrow 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I should be the last one to defend the existing system. But IMHO DEI answers the wrong question. Worthwhile lives does not come from equal access to the hamster wheel. I am much more pro UBI structures og negative taxation - which are inherently difficult to make descriminatory as there is no personal judgement of the people to receive it.
	▲	JuniperMesos 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You probably don't actually want corporations that do intrinsically care about being able to violate federal civil rights and anti-discrimination law, and are willing to lose money and give up influence in order to keep doing so.