Isn't this standard C level behaviour?

Before AI tools like Plaud.AI, this wasnt near possible because of work/time, and no person usually do not remember exactly who said what 6 month before,unless there is some email conversation.

With Plaud, you can check unlimited backwards who said what in which meeting and what was wanted to achieve - very interesting actually to find things in there 6m later, while people said they will do it at ends of month and youself just forgot it already - and these systems allow you to chase exactly these discrepancies.

▲

dylan604 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Before, they'd hire some humans to do the research. No self respecting C-suite person would ever consider doing something resembling actual work. How long have corps been required to keep copies of emails/chats/etc?

▲

anonymous908213 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Before AI tools like Plaud.AI, this wasnt near possible because of work/time,

What is "work" to an executive if not using their privileged access to data to violate the privacy of anyone they have a grievance against?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBay_stalking_scandal

This has been happening long before LLMs, and this eBay case is notable only for the fact that it was actually publicly documented and prosecuted, not for the fact that it happened. I've personally been privy to two situations with other companies where the owner was doing something like this but nothing came of it legally. See also Meta employees looking up nudes streamed from people's Meta spy glasses, and Flock-using police stalking their exes. Smaller scale, but this also happens all the time with internet community moderators/admins. Humans are on average cretins, give them authority and the ability to abuse it and they will abuse it.

	▲	autoexec 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Humans abusing power isn't new, but the tools that make abusing power easier than ever are.