| ▲ | binlog 6 hours ago |
| Similar to how people realized their Google searches were accessible to law enforcement. “I did not kill my wife!” “Cool so why did you search for how to hide a dead body the same day she went missing?” |
|
| ▲ | randycupertino 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| There was a mom in Utah who killed her husband poisoning him with a moscow mule spiked with fentanyl who googled "luxury prisons for the rich" as well as "how long does life insrance companies takento.pay" "can you delete everythjng on an old icloud account" "can deleted text messages be retrieved" "what information can be cbtained from a cellphone" "how to turn find my iphone off" "can cops force you to do a lie detector test," "when does FBI get involved in a case," "what is considered a lethal.dose of fentanyl" and "what are you allowed inside utah jails." She took out $2 million in life insurance on him and was having an affair with their handyman and they were having disputes about $$. https://www.ktvu.com/news/utah-mom-kouri-richins-googled-lux... After she killed him she authored a children's book about grief for kids. |
| |
| ▲ | pcthrowaway 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | A woman who wrote a romance fiction novel called "How to Murder Your Husband" was convicted of murdering her husband https://www.npr.org/2022/05/26/1101433465/how-to-murder-your... | | |
| ▲ | xrd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Someday AI will kill someone. And, then it'll write a book about it. It will do that because it read "How to Murder Your Husband" as part of its training. I'm going to be very confused about how to feel about that. When we arraign the AI, should there be two counts against it: stealing and murder? Or, can it plead that "my daddy, Sam Altman, told me to read this, I was born into a moral void." Plot twist: the judge will be AI from Russia. | | |
| ▲ | skinfaxi 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I read arraigning AI like putting down a rabid dog, except worse because you can't transfer to another machine the weights of the dog's brain (yet). | |
| ▲ | SanjayMehta 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why Russia? Why not China? After all, China is way ahead of Russia in this aspect. | | |
| ▲ | xrd an hour ago | parent [-] | | I'm obviously not a skilled writer. You should read AI written books exclusively. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Zambyte 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | To be fair, it wasn't titled "How to get away with murdering your husband" | |
| ▲ | hefner1456 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | She tried to poison him twice and he stayed with her. Now, thats ... uh ... love.. i think. She must have been one top notch narcissist to drag him along. | | |
| ▲ | randycupertino 16 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yes- she actually tried multiple times! The saddest part is he told his friends and family he thought she was trying to poison him but stayed with her because of the kids. Totally infuriating. > Eric Richins told the other friend he thought his wife had tried to poison him, prosecutors allege. > "They advised he warned them that if anything happened to him she was to blame," the records said. Eric Richins, according to the records, suspected his wife had tried to poison him on multiple occasions. "According to a sister, Eric and his wife went to Greece a few years ago and after his wife gave him a drink he became violently ill and called his sister saying he believed his wife had tried to kill him," the records said. "On Valentine’s Day of 2022, his wife brought him a sandwich, which after one bite Eric broke into hives and couldn’t breathe. He used his son’s epi-pen as well as Benadryl before passing out for several hours," according to the records. |
| |
| ▲ | soundnote 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Similar story for many rap albums. Quite a few rappers have rapped about murders and oops, turns out they really did do it. | | | |
| ▲ | mcphage an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well, they do say write what you know. | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | An essay it seems like, which wasn't included in the trial even: > Crampton Brophy's how-to treatise detailed various options for committing an untraceable killing and professed a desire to avoid getting caught. Circuit Judge Christopher Ramras ultimately excluded the essay from the trial, noting it was published in 2011. A prosecutor, however, alluded to the essay's themes without naming it after Crampton Brophy took the stand. |
| |
| ▲ | dmoy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Man I really need to stop playing modern setting TTRPGs | | | |
| ▲ | crossroadsguy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > "when does FBI get involved in a case," Now I can see why local law enforcement would have made it a priority to get her :D | |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | mrheosuper 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| He should have searched "How to dispose a 130lb chicken". Rockie mistake. |
| |
|
| ▲ | godwinson__4-8 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes, what an idiot. He should have searched "I love my wife". Then law enforcement would know he couldn't possibly. Open and shut case, Johnson. |
| |
| ▲ | skinfaxi 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | What point are you making here? Do you think a judge or jury would give both of those instances equal weight? | | |
| ▲ | godwinson__4-8 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | All other things being equal, why would it matter if a suspect instead of saying something obviously incriminating, had instead said something diametrically opposed? Is that what you are asking? If so, I'm confused. Why wouldn't it matter? Wouldn't this necessarily only be the case where the Google search doesn't really matter at all (i.e. there is sufficient other incriminating evidence). Anyway I also think you're missing what was merely meant to be a comment in jest. But now I'm actually confused what point you are trying to make. | | |
| ▲ | binlog 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because people are going to lie in their own favor. Do you think that claims of innocence should be given the same weight as confessions of guilt? | | |
| ▲ | godwinson__4-8 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What makes a Google search a confession? If the implication is the Google search is an implicit confession, because in a Google search you think you are not being watched, and thus are confessing your honest desires, why would his search of love be a "claim of innocence" rather than a "confession of love"? | |
| ▲ | autoexec 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think confessions of guilt should be given much weight either. Innocent people confess to crimes all the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | the_af 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Similar to how people realized their Google searches were accessible to law enforcement. There's probably a regression in beliefs, actually. Even here on HN, for more tech-savvy people. We used to know all the hard lessons of lack of privacy in browsing the internet, using Google services, etc. I remember when (tech) people were up in arms that Gmail scanned your emails, remember that? Well, all of that is seemingly forgotten in the age of LLM chat bots. It's back to square one. People need to relearn all the lessons, it's as if AI magically erased all of what we used to know about online privacy. |
|
| ▲ | dzhiurgis 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| "I wanted to know what would potential killer would've done because I know you guys are doing fuck all to find her" |
