| ▲ | square_usual 8 hours ago |
| That is the standard pricing for Opus-class models these days. |
|
| ▲ | eptcyka 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Blaze it, Robot! |
|
| ▲ | LeBit 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 4/20. It is to Musk what 67 is to children. |
| |
| ▲ | harambae an hour ago | parent [-] | | I think it's more 420 or 4:20 (marijuana reference) than 4/20 (Hitler's birthday). Although given it's Musk, others may disagree. |
|
|
| ▲ | ac29 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| GLM 5.3 is roughly Opus class and is much, much cheaper |
| |
| ▲ | wasfgwp 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s more expensive than 6.1-sol though? At least according to benchmarks. I think at this point comparing raw token pricing is often apples to oranges. | |
| ▲ | vikramkr 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Opus 5 class yes, but opus 5.5 is functionally mythos tier | |
| ▲ | simonw 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Opus 5.5 class? | | |
| ▲ | ac29 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | No, since that's a moving target. But the large GLM models are likely in a similar model weight class to the Opus family, just a few months behind | |
| ▲ | girvo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, and anyone who says otherwise is being silly. It’s still damned capable though, I’ve done a crazy amount of good work with 5.3 Flash. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | WhereIsTheTruth 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| There is no such thing as "standard pricing" for products with different performance profiles, architectures, inference costs and infrastructure stack It is price fixing, nothing else |
