| ▲ | schmichael 4 hours ago | |||||||
Fair but I also know plenty of people who give their elderly folks their old iPads. If you fit all the important apps on the home screen and tweak a couple things, I can't imagine the UX could be any more complex than for this device. Mobility and screen size is even more important for the elderly. They don't want to stand in their kitchen staring down at a little computer to talk to their grandchild on a tiny screen. And finally, when they do have issues and ask you questions: now it's questions about an unfamiliar device you may not own yourself! Old iPad still seems optimal for this demographic. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Miraste 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Screen size is a good point. For the other things, I suppose I was thinking of my own grandparents, who had memory issues and would've benefited from a device that can't be misplaced. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rjrjrjrj 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
iPad OS still has a zillion failure modes for the elderly. Long press, split screen and the other multitasking paradigms, multi-finger gestures, touch id, background audio from some tab in Safari... there's just no end of features that can throw them off. And it isn't multi-user. Not sure if HomeView is the answer, but some aspects of the video were interesting. eg super-fast user switching with no explicit login; and how it puts Siri forward as the primary UI in a way that the iPad doesn't, even if the iPad technically has the same capabilities. That they drilled a hole through the kitchen island table top for the power cord was hilarious. Exactly zero people in the real world are going to do that. | ||||||||
| ||||||||