| ▲ | im3w1l 5 hours ago | |||||||
So then if the BB sequence has finitely many entries. What does it mean that it grows faster than any computable sequence? A finite sequence can't have any asymptotic behavior right? | ||||||||
| ▲ | gizmo686 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The BB sequence still has infinitely many entries. Any turing machine will either halt or not halt. For any N, there is a finite set of N-state turing machines which halt, and there is therefore a finite number of steps after which all halting N-state turing machines would halt. There is a point where these values become uncomputable, but they still exist (for some definition of exist). | ||||||||
| ▲ | cobbal 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
As others have said, the sequence is infinite, though unknowable. Even if math can't say what the precise value is, it can still prove things about the shape of the sequence. As a simple example, we know that BB(1000) <= BB(1001) (since you can encode the longest running 1000-TM with an extra, unused state as a 1001-TM) even though we will never know either of those values. The argument that it grows faster than any computable function is similar in that it proves things without knowing concrete numbers. (I'd have to look up the details of the proof to say more) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | GolDDranks 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Where did you get that the BB sequence would have finitely many entries? You can choose any integer n for BB(n), and there are infinitely many integers. | ||||||||