Remix.run Logo
▲ cromka 6 hours ago

And only a gigabit Ethernet port...

▲penagwin 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Would there be any point in 2.5gbps beyond installing system updates a few seconds faster?

AFAIK you’d be hard pressed to hit 150mbps with your own local media.

And any streaming services will use way less - Netflix and Hulu recommend a mere 16Mbps at 4k for example.

▲cromka 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Apple TV can double as Home Hub device in which it records/routes to/ cloud from your cameras. Combined with high-res content, e.g. when streaming games, it can saturate the 1GbE.

Also, just learned it's still 4k 60Hz. So forget 120Hz gaming. Game streaming is likely to become a default in near future at the hardware proces we see, so limiting to 60Hz is really cheap of them at this point.

▲imoverclocked 9 minutes ago | parent [-]

I’m not a gamer so I had to look this up. The Google AI answer for cloud gaming stated a stable 15-20Mbps connection as a requirement. Obviously latency matters in many scenarios but raw bandwidth might be overstated?

▲imoverclocked 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Any use for a faster port in this device? I use gig-e on my current 4K and it’s really nice to reduce latency (compared to WiFi) but I doubt 2.5G or 10G would be that useful… unless there were an SFP+ port where I could run fiber instead.

▲cromka 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, responded to similar question adjacent to yours

▲XajniN 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]