| ▲ | schleck8 3 hours ago | |||||||
This seems reductive. Character.ai has > 20 million monthly active users, and a lot of company valuation happens on the basis of user count (which is legitimate, that's not vaporware) | ||||||||
| ▲ | thor-rodrigues 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I have the impression that if MAU by itself was sufficient, the company wouldn’t have had to file for bankruptcy. Obviously the company failed to convert its MAU into paying users, despite the fact the token costs greatly declined over the last years. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | PxldLtd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I disagree that it's reductive. If each user costs more in API tokens then your company isn't valuable. That's what everyone's been screaming from the rooftops about there being a bubble. We certainly use tons of AI at the company I work for, if we were paying full API prices then I would bet we'd be barely using it. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | skeeter2020 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
webvan and pets.com have entered the chat. | ||||||||
| ▲ | irl_zebra 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
As we saw after the hero Zelenskyy took down Yandex data centers, user count seems to be vaporware in many cases. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | cicko an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
A drug dealer at the corner also has lots of active monthly users. | ||||||||