| ▲ | usui 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||
The counterfactual doesn't make sense. Which country would stop or grind to a halt after electing a corrupt president? I think almost all countries would keep running at a basically normal capacity until failure, yet that doesn't prove those countries have great systems. This will need a lot more time and hindsight to make general statements in terms of the wider picture. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | diydsp 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
It'a not abt whether it keeps running. It's whether its citizens are able to maintain their rights. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mxkopy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I think it’s sarcasm. In other counties such corruption would trigger revolution, and the political system would grind to a halt | ||||||||||||||