No, I don’t care. Until there is a real, practical result, I don’t care. There are plenty of examples of math discovered in service of solving a problem. There is nothing that says math has to be purely abstract first.

Because clearly we’d have invented GPS if we had asked ourselves “how do I create a global positioning system with centimeter accuracy”?

And that's fine, caring about everything is exhausting, someone has to solve real world problem. But dismissing a result since it's not practical is not fine

You can't imagine how that severely limits the potential size of the discovery space shackling it to present day problems?

Ironic username as I doubt we'd get to the stars with your philosophy.

How far are you willing to go? In your radical pragmatism, are you an intuitionist, or even a finitist? Oh wait, these are pure math topics that you do not care a about!