Remix.run Logo
▲ InsidiousWombat a day ago

But you don't need to replace entire system to massively reduce surface area for the attack. Just do what was done for decades, and put the vulnerable devices between VPN and/or additional authorisation layer.

It's far less work than touching anything on controller side (at most changing some network settings) and requires attacker to at the very least penetrate your network perimeter and snoop around to find it rather than "run nmap on a controller's default port over country's IP range"

▲wolfi1 a day ago | parent [-]

don't connect these to the internet that's how it was done

▲Turskarama 20 hours ago | parent [-]

That's effectively what "require a VPN" means. You can simply block any connection that doesn't come through the VPN.

▲wolfi1 20 hours ago | parent [-]

a vpn is not as safe as you think it is.

▲Turskarama 19 hours ago | parent [-]

An enterprise grade VPN is pretty damn safe. A government could probably get in but then a government probably isn't going to bother hacking your fridges to defrost.

▲InsidiousWombat 17 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, unless you buy one from Fortinet.