> Have you proof read what you wrote?

yes, but not in a meaningful way

> With your lack of specificity for the word "thinking", you're casting a rather broad argument;

that's intentional— specific = snowflake → broad = cattle. Same goes for craft vs at-scale manufacturing.

Also Ford was right about horses. Who's the horse now? I've been saying it from the horse perspective too for a while https://x.com/clehene/status/1768411925057347822

At the end of the day, your thoughts are important to everyone else but the "market"— you, your mom, etc. But the market doesn't care about your reasoning and hence can be "irrational" longer than you can be "right".

Also note that rational/irrational is a reasoning aspect. Automating it was on Aristotle's mind too.