Yes, but why? Why really? Are you Valgrinding the s*t out of the code? What about memory leaks? No template language? Did you use an A.I. Agent? I mean, the code is probably porn for GTK/glib coders, unless it's a horror movie instead. I'm really confused on the motivation there.

▲

fg137 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> CGI's decline was justified in 2004 but doesn't hold up in 2026.

I mean, the article should not be taken seriously on any technical level. It's ok just for fun.

	▲	chihuahua 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I think the best parody is one that leaves the reader wondering if it was intended as parody, or if the author was serious.