No, the tooling I make has better UX very quickly. It is built for their financial goals, not for the end user.

carterschonwald 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

this 1000x. a lot of details in context compaction, editing, reverting ux, etc are all really centered on keeping the load and cost of subscription users as small as possible. its no always that nor is it necessarily correct, but its a huge driver of how those subscriptions and first party apps are designed

▲

ctxc 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I know this is an unpopular opinion, but it's actually good. - pasting lots of content became [35 lines] and they added a tiny notification to show it as-is if you paste again - interactive questions layout - paste images - the recap - auto-updating session titles

And so many more. I tried codex and it was lacking in many UX aspects. Remember we got from a text-paragraph-only terminal to this at breakneck speed.

	▲	asgraham 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I’m not deeply pro-codex, but it does have all those features. Who knows since when.