I’d love to read more books on paper but purely from a utilitarian standpoint, the UK’s race to enormous books (both hardback and paperback) makes it unworkable. Some of the latest books are more like pulpit bibles than something I can toss in a bag for the commute.

▲

Grombobulous 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In my mind the problem is that those buyers have better places to go than mass market paperbacks.

Someone like you who cares about practicality of “tossing in a bag for a commute” is better served by an e-reader.

Someone who finds hardcovers and big paperbacks too expensive or ungainly, again, better served by e-readers.

Someone who wants the cheapest price possible: e-readers.

That leaves the physical book buyer in much be same niche as a vinyl or 4K UHD Blu-ray buyer. They aren’t buying for convenience and the way the physical object looks and performs matters a lot more than convenience.

	▲	PaulHoule 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		In my mind the change happened long before e-Readers came along. Even in the 1980s there was a surge in expensive "trade paperbacks" that were frequently terribly built. Like you buy one from the store and open it and the binding cracks the very first time. I have a lot of mass market paperbacks that I mostly bought used in the 1980 and I'd say in the 2000s they were in mostly excellent condition, but at this point in time they are pretty yellowed. My storage conditions are awful, an old farmhouse with a permeable basement, but when I look at books of all kind from the 1960s and 1970s, especially mass market paperbacks that have been rebound, the yellowing is severe. But even despite them being "cheap", "low quality", etc. I think they were mass produced and more consistent in quality than many more expensive books. I buy a lot of e-Books but I am putting together a kit for doing tarot readings for other people (most people find the cards are cooperative 30-50% of the time but I have a shtick that gets a response I like almost 100%) and I am starting to be able to work without a book but I still want books and for that I want real books, small books, not something to look at on a phone or tablet.

▲

TheOtherHobbes 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's been a trend for some genres to bloat. The usual industry guidance is that a novel shouldn't be more than 100k words, but 120k words is tolerable at a push. But some fantasy and adjacent writers have been producing 200k words, and plenty of readers love them.

200k on a screen is trivial, but in paper form it's a monster.