I don't think the post was written by AI.

It has headers like AI blogposts, and features a lot of parallel structure like AI blogposts ("there's no <blank>. you <blank>"), but if you actually read it none of it reads like slop. To me anyway.

▲

xd1936 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Interestingly, Pangram says that exactly the first 50% is AI and the second half is not. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

	▲	Muhammad523 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not that those tools are that accurate
	▲	CharlesW 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		https://mitsloanedtech.mit.edu/ai/teach/ai-detectors-dont-wo...
	▲	exe34 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You could have saved milliseconds and used a pseudo random number generator.

▲

exe34 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It reads like autism to me. The theme confirms that.

▲

cnqso 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]