> Show me the relevant criminal law that you claim applies without intentional access.

All laws apply culpability when intent is lacking.

You aren't naive enough to believe that this audience has never seen the analogy with "intentionally run over someone" (murder) and "accidentally run over someone" (culpable homicide), are you?

You don't think AI-boosters have been spewing your argument here daily?

There are no special laws carving out lack of intent when it comes to computers.

> All laws apply culpability when intent is lacking.

Incorrect. Each criminal offense has its own legal requirements.

Criminally negligent homicide in your example is an independently defined offense.

You would need to identify a criminal statue punishing negligent or reckless unauthorized computer access.