Remix.run Logo
▲ rootusrootus an hour ago

Dominated by labor costs, right? It'll probably just keep going up at this point, even if the panel cost went to zero.

▲klardotsh an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Generally correct. Here in Washington I could get Signature Solar to ship me 31 excellent Canadian Solar bifacial panels on a pallet for $9200 plus tax and shipping (so add another grand or so). This would be 21kW of solar (plus a bit if bifacial gain kicks in), which is a ton - you could even do some winter work with that, if angled correctly.

This setup would cost north of $50k (possibly north of $75k, depending) if installed by contractors. Labor costs are extremely high here, since COL is extremely high.

▲lostapathy an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A lot of the "labor" costs are just regulatory/permitting in disguise. An expedited approval regime with standards such that, permits-wise, installing solar panels was as easy as installing an EV charger would save a ton of money.

Matt Ferrell just did a video on this recently https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3eEzdpi12I

▲cucumber3732842 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

You're scooping up a lot of regulation and red tape in that "labor" bucket.