| ▲ | kaydub 2 hours ago | |
Except they didn't ban verbally abusive language towards its agents. I hate when people put things in quotes as if they're quoting something but it's not even a quote of anything. Maybe go read the user policy instead of the headlines and the snippets. If your attention span can't manage that, get off the computer a little bit. | ||
| ▲ | dccoolgai 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Let me help you: here it is, straight from them with word "abusive". https://www.anthropic.com/research/end-subset-conversations Try reading yourself a little more carefully next time. | ||
| ▲ | jayd16 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It seems like a close enough summary. What do you think is the substantive difference that invalidates the point? | ||