> For an outright ban on "LLM, AI or agent assisted code contributions", they do very little to define what that means.

It means: did you use AI? If so, we don't want it.

Like come on. They don't like your new shiny toy and you're mad about it, but there's no need to be purposely obtuse.

You fire up an IDE, you write code, you submit it. That is not an AI contribution. You fire up Claude Code and prompt it, you submit it. That's an AI contribution.

Contributing to projects is a privilege not a right, and if you fail to contribute, be it because your PR was written like shit, be it your documentation wasn't complete, be it you didn't abide the style guides, or, yes, be it you used AI and they don't want AI, your submission doesn't go in. That's that. 2 + 2 = 4.

To be blunt it's wild that otherwise very intelligent people keep getting bluescreened by the fact that they occasionally must reckon with other intelligent people who do not necessarily believe the same things as them. Have y'all never gone outside or what?