There is nothing wrong with nostalgia. Some property developers makes money from nostalgic architecture. Fashion clothing is often a mix of new and nostalgia.

▲

m000 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The problem in this case (and many others) is that nostalgia is limited to the form, bordering on fetishism, while the utilitarian and economic aspects of the original are brushed aside.

From TFA: "The car had high wheel arches and soft suspension, letting it travel across a ploughed field or rough roads - as legend would have it, without breaking a tray of duck eggs. Its high roof let drivers wear a hat at the wheel. It was easy to drive and simple to repair."

Which of those qualities have been retained in this 2CV revival?

▲

robotmay 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well the suspension is less of an issue these days due to technical advances. Ground clearance is more of an issue than the suspension travel. This looks more like it's targeted towards city use than the countryside use of the original, especially as it looks to have a notably shorter wheelbase. There's a usecase for small city cars that look cute though.

▲

Mashimo 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why does it need the same qualities as the old car?

People want cheap and small electric city cars, why not make it in the style of an iconic car? We already have plenty of mid sized cars that look all the same.

▲

m000 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Small electric city cars are convenience mobility for affluent consumers, not a proper car proposition.

I want a car that I can also comfortably drive to the beach, or to the next town. And also looks good, and comes in colors other than black/white/beige.

	▲	pasc1878 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		In Europe a small city car will drive to the next town and in much of Europe to the beach. "In Europe 100 miles is a long way in USA/Australia 100 years is long ago"