> Can they be abused? Probably, but so can just about anything. Passkeys do, on the other hand, offer some real tangible benefits that other mainstream solutions do not.

Let the usecases that need passkeys use it.

Why can't there be a parallel standard with similar features that doesn't have the parts that can potentially be abused. If the difference between abuse and non-abuse is a vague promise and the good graces of corporate structures, it is better to err on the side of caution and demand solutions that make it impossible.

> The people don't care enough to bother, and that's fine - it's not your (or my) place to force other people to do anything.

Yeah it wasn't your place or anyone else's. How can you or I force anyone. Not sure why that even came up.

Debate is how we evolve new and alternate solutions. Handwaving by saying not your place or mine is not how we affect change if needed.