| ▲ | culi an hour ago | |
> This is an amusing little scandal, but it seems to be only a procedural issue. If you go out and illegally cut down a tree, that's not "only a procedural issue". They illegally logged 815 acres of forest. | ||
| ▲ | jltsiren an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Breaking the law is a procedural issue. Logging a few hundred hectares was not a problem. Google could have done that without additional permits, if their intention was to plant a new forest afterwards. Environmental impact assessment was only necessary, because they intended to replace the forest with something else. The key question is whether Google can comply with the law after the fact. If they complete the assessment and the government finds nothing that would prevent the construction of the data centers, the project can go on. Maybe there will be some minor sanctions, as well as some delays, as they didn't do things properly the first time. And even if there is something that prevents construction, Google can still probably comply by planting a new forest. | ||
| ▲ | dackdel an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
they illegally destroyed 815 acres of forest | ||