| ▲ | Gualdrapo 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So as every time I read something decrying how webp is allegedly "annoying", the conclusion is that the problem was never about webp itself but the tooling and ecosystem to handle it | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dspillett 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I haven't seen much if anything saying webp itself is annoying directly, and your conclusion agrees with what I've seen. The complaining I've seen is about the tooling available (mainly from non-techies who don't care to know how to convert to another image format because, and I agree, why should they?) that once you've got a webp image file from one site the next site you try to upload it to doesn't accept them. For those of us who can convert the tooling has been there for ages, as have editors happy to load and save the format. Though TBH I still use JPEG, PNG, or GIF, depending on use case, out of habit. The size saving for the same quality of lossy compression is not something I've found myself hankering for. It is different if you run a site that sends out millions of every image, but nothing I do is that popular and is never likely to be, and no one stuck on a really slow connection where the difference would matter to them is going to be accessing my stuff. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is there a real distinction? It can be a great format, but if actually using it sucks then in practice it's a pain to use/encounter. (I don't actually have this problem personally - all my apps seem to handle it fine - but the argument seems reasonable.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | edwinjm 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does Windows already display WebP files in File Explorer? :-| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | testing22321 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> the conclusion is that the problem was never about webp itself but the tooling and ecosystem to handle it That is true in life. EVs aren’t annoying, the charging infrastructure is. Etc | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | azuanrb 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> the tooling and ecosystem to handle it That’s the whole point, though. If the tools I use don’t handle it properly, it’s annoying. Saying it’s an ecosystem problem doesn’t change that. How long has it been now? And from what I’ve seen, even Google’s own stuff doesn’t always handle it. That’s not helping their case. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | colordrops 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yeah it's purely the fault of the tens of thousands of application devs that have been too stupid to recognize the obvious and immense benefits of webp over existing widely adopted formats /s | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stackghost 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Firefox actually silently and automatically converts images to webp in some cases when you Save As them, with no option to revert to the format you see in the DOM. It’s fucking infuriating. I hate webp because the support is so spotty. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||