| ▲ | maybewhenthesun 2 hours ago | |
100% agreed. This fashion of cranking the base and the high end and removing the middle (simulating a subwoofer with some tiny speakers, basically) can't die fast enough. I mean, fair play for the writer. If he wants it to sound that way he's of course free to do so. But this style is used a lot in concerts and open air amplification and I hate it. My theory is that this style is popular with people playing their music too loud. If your ear feels 'blocked' after a while, your music is too loud. One thing with this style is that, because it leaves the middle (speech) frequencies relatively empty, it feels less blocking. And the high base makes that it doesn't really sound tinny or harsh. But they high base cane easily damage your hearing still. | ||
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
It's not a new fashion. In the 70s/80s hifi often had a "loudness" button which boosted highs and lows, although not as much as they're boosted by EQ settings today. The more recent variant is "smiley curve" EQ - high at the extremes, drooping in the middle. EQ can mess with transients, especially in the bass. You get more volume, but at the expense of some time smearing. | ||