This is a strawman. No one’s saying it’s going to be sudden or anything. It’s gonna have clear provenance and the same type of verification channels

I’m not sure who u or Tao is arguing against.

EDIT: people have a hard time choosing between

1. Yeah it’s pure slop and completely useless

2. Oh no OpenAI has stolen my ideas and solved all my problems and we have nothing to do

My dude, if OpenAI’s dump were really that worthless to be as good as noise, why is Tao getting agitated? Just like ignore it or something.

>>EDIT: people have a hard time choosing between

>> 1. Yeah it’s pure slop and completely useless

>> 2. Oh no OpenAI has stolen my ideas and solved all my problems and we have nothing to do

Could it not be all of the above - OAI stole ideas, there is slop in OAI's work given that they themselves retracted a few of the papers?

>>No one’s saying it’s going to be sudden or anything

hmm. 700 papers released in one day.

>>It’s gonna have clear provenance and the same type of verification channels

what's gonna have clear provenance? - the math slop they released has already been rebuked by human mathematicians as incoherent and deserving of desk rejection.