|
| ▲ | dekhn 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| He didn't do us any favors by writing that slide in a convoluted and inaccurate way. If AI found a way to exploit clinical trial design, it would be noticed and the errors corrected. In fact, that would be a major win because it would probably lead to improved clinical trial designs. |
| |
| ▲ | Yoric 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > If AI found a way to exploit clinical trial design, it would be noticed and the errors corrected. Do you think so? So far, AI is gaming lots of things, and I don't see much fixing in the processes. | | |
| ▲ | dekhn 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Medicine is highly regulated and validated, there are multiple levels of checks, with the final one being doctors seeing patients. I suppose if we closed all the loops and the entire end-to-end process was completely automated, it wouldn't be surprising if we failed to notice. |
| |
| ▲ | ziiinq 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
| ▲ | CamperBob2 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's an ignorant way to make a point that might or might not be valid. Tao evidently isn't aware that many medications we've relied on for decades still have a poorly-understood mechanism of action. If we followed the precautionary principle and waited until we understood everything there is to know about every drug on the shelf, a lot of people now living would be dead. |