| ▲ | chpatrick 6 hours ago |
| What if it takes your five years to live down to two in horrible agony? |
|
| ▲ | qup 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Then it won't be a cure for cancer Tao called it a cure, see the thing I quoted. |
| |
| ▲ | Fraterkes 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think this is just an embarrasingly bad faith / low effort way of engaging with the argument. | |
| ▲ | chpatrick 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "its model predicts [...] will kill cancer cells" | | |
| ▲ | qup 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Before injecting this cocktail into your bloodstream, would you want to know that there is at least one human cancer expert who understands the mechanism behind this cure? It's a cure | | |
| ▲ | chpatrick 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | ...his point is we don't know if it is a cure or not, and it would be good if humans had an idea instead of just having to take the AI's word for it. | | |
| |
| ▲ | squidmaster 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | pixl97 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I mean stuff like this happens in trials without AI too. |
