You're confusing entertainment with art.

Art is a form of expression and/or communication. It's interesting because it shows us different perspectives, as well as things that overlap with ours. When you see a smiley face on your lawn and think it's a sign by the person you just fell in love with, and then find out the exact same artifact was in fact created by wind sweeping some branches together, you'll feel different about it. Similar for art. Or take jokes. A friend might find a joke of yours funny they might not find funny from a person they dislike. That's not "unfair" or "objectively wrong", just like rejecting the same artifact depending on source. If you don't understand this, you talking about "magic" is the cope.

> Its just that I haven't seen one of those in a while.

So that's the argument for making sure of that? Heh.

> Artists are concerned for their jobs; That I get.

The article isn't about artists being concerned for their jobs. This is about people rejecting slop.